California Wildfire Legal Response: Executive Orders, CEQA Exemptions, and Rebuilding Guidelines
The Los Angeles and Ventura County wildfires are, first and foremost, a human tragedy, displacing families, devastating communities and upending lives. But in addition, the physical destruction they’ve caused has created multifaceted legal challenges for California attorneys to navigate as property owners begin the long road to recovery. More than 16,000 structures have been destroyed, resulting in billions of dollars of estimated damage.
Swift governmental action has followed, aimed at cutting through regulatory hurdles and expediting rebuilding efforts. Here’s what to know about evolving state and local regulations in California as you advise clients on rebuilding, including the executive orders, exemptions and pending legislation for fire-affected areas.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has used emergency powers to cut through some bureaucratic red tape, issuing multiple executive orders designed to expedite recovery efforts in the LA region that address debris removal, price gouging, temporary housing, obstacles to rebuilding and other critical post-disaster issues.
One key element of these efforts is Executive Order (EO) N-4-25, which exempts projects from environmental regulations under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Coastal Act if they are aimed at repairing or rebuilding structures that were substantially damaged or destroyed. Issued while the fires were still burning, this order was aimed at helping people get back into their homes as soon as possible. However, it has triggered debates over whether expediting recovery should come at the cost of thorough environmental oversight.
EO N-20-25 followed soon after, providing unprecedented flexibility for property owners looking to rebuild. This order expanded the preliminary information in EO N-4-25 and clarified which projects qualify for exemptions.
These exemptions are not automatic and come with specific conditions. Property owners must carefully assess whether their plans meet these parameters to take advantage of the regulatory relief.
Applicable projects include:
EO N-14-25 aimed to clarify procedures and prevent delays caused by conflicting interpretations of existing laws. The governor’s order explicitly:
The permitting process has been streamlined to facilitate faster rebuilding of structures destroyed by the wildfires. Under state law, buildings constructed in compliance with the 2019 California Building Code (CBC) don’t need additional plan review if rebuilt to the same specifications. However, local enforcement agencies still have discretion over whether further review is necessary, and the 2022 CBC evaluation standards still apply.
Also, coastal development permits have been suspended for certain temporary and permanent housing. This includes establishing, repairing and operating mobile homes and special occupancy parks, mobile homes, manufactured homes and RVs on private property.
The city of Los Angeles has complemented state efforts with its own executive order, introducing more streamlined approaches. Mayor Karen Bass’ order includes expedited permit review, elimination of discretionary review processes and a seven-year window for obtaining repair or reconstruction permits.
One critical aspect of these orders is that the local agencies issuing development and building permits are the “sole agencies” for deciding whether a property or facility is eligible for the exemptions. That means their determinations are not appealable to the Coastal Commission or any state agency.
Local jurisdictions are able (but not required) to create their own guidance for implementing the orders, so be sure to monitor affected jurisdictions such as the city of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, Malibu and Pasadena.
As cleanup efforts continue, expect new and amended executive orders, legislation, funding and local guidance. Updates to LA’s fire hazard maps are expected in May, and government agencies are working to create more robust frameworks for future disaster response.
With over 30 wildfire-related bills introduced at the state level, there is plenty of legislative activity that could impact rebuilding efforts and future wildfire mitigation strategies. Key legislation includes:
Despite these promising developments, significant challenges remain. Local agencies face staffing shortages, debris removal is estimated to take up to 18 months, and there are concerns about potential population shifts. The complex interplay between state and local mandates continues to create uncertainty for property owners and developers. Navigating this landscape requires patience, preparedness and strategic thinking.
Attorneys advising clients affected by the wildfires should:
The regulatory response to the LA and Ventura County wildfires reflects the urgency of rebuilding in a state already facing a severe housing crisis. While the exemptions from CEQA and Coastal Act requirements represent significant streamlining, be prepared for continued evolution.
As California adapts to increasing wildfire risks, expect to see more permanent changes to land use regulations in high fire severity zones. Attorneys practicing in this area will need to stay vigilant as some of these emergency measures transition into long-term policy changes.
This blog post summarizes key points from a recent CEB webinar, “CEQA Suspension: 5 Key Interim Measures,” featuring Sheppard Mullin partners Lauren Chang and Whitney Hodges. For a more detailed discussion, the webinar recording is available at ceb.com/webinars.