Case Law in Employment Discrimination: Recent Rulings and Their Impact

Employment discrimination remains one of the most dynamic areas of legal practice, with significant rulings continually shaping the landscape. Courts across the United States address a wide range of claims involving race, gender, age, disability, sexual orientation, and religious discrimination under federal statutes like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Staying informed about recent case law is crucial for attorneys advising clients or litigating employment discrimination cases.

Recent Notable Rulings

1. Bostock v. Clayton County (2020): Expanding Title VII Protections

The Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County marked a landmark shift in employment discrimination law. The Court held that Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination “because of sex” includes discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Justice Gorsuch, writing for the majority, emphasized that firing an individual for being gay or transgender inherently involves treating that person differently due to their sex.

Impact:

• Employers must ensure workplace policies and practices align with expanded Title VII protections.
• Businesses face increased exposure to claims if they fail to accommodate employees based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
• Employers should provide diversity training and revise anti-discrimination policies to reflect these protections.

2. Groff v. DeJoy (2023): Clarifying Religious Accommodations

In Groff v. DeJoy, the Supreme Court raised the standard for evaluating religious accommodation requests under Title VII. The Court ruled that employers must demonstrate that denying an accommodation would cause “substantial increased costs” to their operations. This decision revisits the previously lower “de minimis” burden standard established in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison (1977).

Impact:

• Employers may need to provide more robust accommodations for religious practices, such as flexible scheduling or exemptions from specific job requirements.
• Legal exposure for failing to grant religious accommodations has increased, requiring careful assessment of accommodation requests.

3. Hughes v. Northwestern University (2022): Addressing Employer Fiduciary Duties

Though primarily a case about retirement plans, Hughes v. Northwestern University has broader implications for employer obligations. The Supreme Court held that the existence of diverse plan options does not absolve employers from ensuring all offered plans meet fiduciary standards. While not an employment discrimination case directly, this ruling underscores the increasing scrutiny on employer responsibilities.

Impact:

• Employers must be vigilant in providing equitable access to benefits, avoiding potential claims of disparate impact discrimination.
• Discrimination claims related to benefits, such as retirement plans, may grow in complexity.

Trends and Emerging Issues in Employment Discrimination

1. Pay Transparency and Gender Equity

The push for pay equity has gained momentum with new state laws requiring pay transparency. Cases involving unequal pay, such as under the Equal Pay Act, are rising. Employers must be prepared to defend compensation practices and address disparities proactively.

2. Remote Work and Disability Accommodations

The rise of remote work has redefined reasonable accommodations under the ADA. Courts are increasingly asked to decide whether remote work qualifies as a reasonable accommodation for employees with disabilities. Recent cases highlight the need for employers to evaluate telework requests on a case-by-case basis, considering the essential functions of the role.

3. Intersectionality in Discrimination Claims

Courts are seeing more claims based on intersectional discrimination, where plaintiffs allege bias based on overlapping characteristics, such as race and gender. For example, Kimberly Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College (2017) expanded the interpretation of sex discrimination to include intersectional claims, reflecting a broader approach to Title VII enforcement.

Practical Implications for Employers

1. Policy Updates and Training

Employers must regularly update workplace policies to comply with evolving legal standards. This includes revising anti-discrimination and accommodation policies, as well as implementing robust training programs to educate managers on new legal requirements and emerging trends.

2. Proactive Compliance Measures

• Diversity Audits: Conduct regular reviews of hiring, promotion, and compensation practices to identify and address disparities.
• Accommodation Procedures: Establish clear protocols for evaluating and granting accommodation requests under the ADA and Title VII.
• Complaint Mechanisms: Create accessible reporting systems for employees to raise concerns about discrimination or harassment.

3. Litigation Preparedness

Employers should work with legal counsel to develop strategies for defending against employment discrimination claims. Key steps include:

• Documenting employment decisions to justify actions based on legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons.
• Conducting thorough investigations into complaints to demonstrate good-faith efforts to address issues.
• Monitoring court decisions and regulatory guidance to adapt practices accordingly.

Strategies for Practitioners

1. Leveraging Precedent

Attorneys must stay updated on the latest case law to effectively advocate for clients. Using decisions like Bostock or Groff, attorneys can argue for expanded protections or higher accommodation standards, depending on their client’s position.

2. Understanding Regulatory Guidance

Beyond case law, practitioners should monitor guidance from agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The EEOC’s interpretations of rulings often shape enforcement priorities and inform best practices.

3. Building a Record

For both plaintiffs and defendants, maintaining a comprehensive record is critical. For employers, this includes documenting efforts to comply with laws and accommodate employees. For plaintiffs, gathering evidence of discriminatory practices or disparate impact strengthens their case.

Stay up to date on employment discrimination with Continuing Education of the Bar (CEB)

CEB provides a range of online services designed to enhance legal practice, including Practitioner, CEB’s all-in-one legal research solution with authoritative practice guides. Practitioner is meticulously crafted by California lawyers for California lawyers, providing comprehensive insights and resources tailored to your specific needs. All practice guides seamlessly integrate with CEB’s primary law research tool, empowering you to delve into California, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and U.S. Supreme Court case law, alongside California statutes and the California Constitution. As part of the Practitioner subscription, you gain access to DailyNews, ensuring you stay updated on any critical new cases or developments in your field. And don’t forget, Practitioner also includes TrueCite®, CEB’s powerful case law citator, enhancing your research efficiency and accuracy.

Our tools offer unparalleled support in case law research, legal analysis, and staying updated with the latest judicial decisions. By choosing CEB, you gain access to a wealth of knowledge, enabling you to navigate complex legal landscapes with confidence and precision.